Getting
ready to board a flight from Dallas to Detroit last Saturday, I picked up a
copy of the Wall Street Journal. The
most interesting articles I spotted were not about the economy, emerging
markets, or the new record highs on the New York Stock Exchange. They were
about the selection of a new pope.
Pope
Benedict XVI stunned his own Roman Catholic Church and the larger world last
month by resigning the papal office. He thus became the first pope to retire
from office since 1415. Now the Journal
was running six views of “What to Look for in a New Pope.” The writers came at
their assignment from a variety of perspectives and with several common themes.
Among them were advocacy for the poor, transparency about recent scandals,
being a moral-spiritual warrior to a world that seems increasingly immoral and
secular, etc.
Among the
suggestions I found most insightful were these words from one of the two female
writers: “[T]he new pope must bring Catholicism back to basics, not to
elaborations on a theme but to the theme itself. The modern Church, at the very
highest levels of its thinking, in the writings of John Paul II and Benedict
XVI, has become somewhat abstract and cerebral. Such things have their place,
but for now, in the ruined world, what’s needed is a reintroduction of Christ
to the rising and post-Christian nations alike, always with an eye to meaning,
meaning.”
I found
Peggy Noonan’s words convicting. They speak not only to Catholics but to
Protestants as well. They are, in fact, variations on a theme that Time magazine noted almost exactly a
year ago. Commenting on Christian believers who say they no longer have a
religious affiliation, the national newsmagazine quoted an ordained
Presbyterian: “My sense is that for most they’re not rejecting God. They’re
rejecting organized religion as being rigid and dogmatic.”
Too
cerebral? Somewhat abstract? Rigid? Dogmatic? Why, how dare anyone say such
things!
Yet Jesus
said similar things about the religion of his day. Tradition had become more
important to the religious leaders than Scripture itself. He allowed that the
Temple had been turned into a marketplace and den of thieves. He protested that
the religion scholars were debating the meaning of obscure texts while the
“weightier matters” of justice, mercy, and faith were being neglected.
To the
degree that any of us who stand in the Christian tradition feel defensive about
the criticisms we hear of church these days – and please hear the term “church”
in its broadest possible connotation – we are likely part of the problem.
Whether Catholics about priestly transgressions or Protestants about
self-aggrandizing televangelists, whether you are non-denominational or a
“none” (i.e., Time’s non-affiliated
believer), we could all benefit by listening.
The world
isn’t dying for a lack of clarity about difficult theological problems or
clerical authority. It needs to encounter its redeemer, Jesus Christ.
Lived faith,
radiant hope, and selfless love – these are the qualities of a Christ-filled life
that will make it possible for someone to meet him through you.